点人溯事 · 历史人物生平行迹专题（第 68 / 74 篇）
白鸟库吉东洋史与疑古行迹（1865年 — 1942年 · 庆应元年至昭和十七年）
Shiratori Kurakichi: Doubting the Sage Kings (1865 CE – 1942 CE · Keiō to Shōwa Japan)
时代跨度：1865年 — 1942年 · 庆应元年至昭和十七年
途经站点：共 8 站
起点 → 终点：千叶 → 东京
全线途经古今地名：千叶（今日本千叶） → 东京帝国大学（今日本东京） → 游学欧洲（今日本东京启程） → 东京帝国大学（今日本东京） → 满铁调查部（今中国大连） → 东洋协会（今日本东京） → 东京（今日本东京） → 东京（今日本东京）。
Route Stops: Chiba (Chiba, Japan) → Tokyo Imperial University (Tokyo, Japan) → Sailing for Europe (Tokyo, Japan) → Tokyo Imperial University (Tokyo, Japan) → SMR Research Bureau, Dairen (Dalian, China) → Tōyō Kyōkai, Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan) → Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan) → Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan).
白鸟库吉东洋史与疑古行迹 · 逐站时空坐标、古今地名与史料诗词详解（8 站）
生于千叶，中学受业于史家那珂通世——那珂将崔述《考信录》引入日本，疑古之种子由此先播。
Born in Chiba to the schoolroom of historian Naka Michiyo, who had introduced Cui Shu’s skeptical scholarship to Japan — the seed was planted early.
入新设之东京帝大史学科，为德国史家里斯（Ludwig Riess）首届学生，受兰克史学之实证训练。
He joined the newly founded history department as one of Ludwig Riess’s first students, trained in Rankean source criticism.
得文学博士后赴德，研究汉学于柏林，转匈牙利布达佩斯治乌拉尔·阿尔泰诸族语言历史；《乌孙考》《朝鲜古代王考》刊于欧洲东方学志。
After his doctorate he studied in Berlin and Budapest, publishing on the Wusun and ancient Korean kingdoms in European orientalist journals.
任东京帝国大学教授，主讲满洲朝鲜史与西域史；以民族学语言学方法治东亚中亚诸族。
He took the Tokyo chair in Manchurian-Korean and Western Regions history, applying philology and ethnography to the peoples of Eurasia.
助满铁设满洲及朝鲜历史地理调查部，主持调查十余年，刊《满鲜历史地理报告》；东洋文库创立后任首任理事长。
He directed the South Manchuria Railway’s historical-geography survey of Manchuria and Korea for over a decade, and later headed the new Toyo Bunko library.
在东洋协会评议会讲演《中国古传说之研究》，谓尧舜禹乃儒家理想之人格化，非实有其人——"抹杀论"一出，轰动史界，日本疑古史学自此启幕。
His lecture on China’s ancient legends argued that Yao, Shun and Yu were Confucian ideals, not men — the "erasure thesis" that opened Japan’s skeptical school and thundered through East Asian historiography.
白鸟库吉《中国古传说之研究》（1909）：“尧、舜、禹之事，天地人各有职守，截然分属，颇不自然，实应大疑。”Shiratori Kurakichi, On Chinese Ancient Legends (1909): "Yao, Shun and Yu each hold heaven, man and earth in separate charge — too neat to be natural; it must be doubted."
应林泰辅等之驳难，续刊《〈尚书〉的高等批判》，并及伏羲神农黄帝；其说东传，与顾颉刚"层累地造成的古史"隔海呼应。
Answering critics, he extended his higher criticism of the Documents to Fuxi and the Yellow Emperor — a debate that crossed the sea to echo Gu Jiegang’s strata theory of ancient history.
3月30日病逝东京，年七十七；《西域史研究》与《白鸟库吉全集》十卷传世。
He died in Tokyo on 30 March 1942; his Western Regions studies filled ten collected volumes.